http://www.officialdatingresource.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/f2.jpg

That lady right there’s supposed to be unattractive? Seriously?

Seriously?

My wife and I would go for her in a second. Yes, both of us. Same goes for a lot of the women in this article. They have the advantage of existing in nature without having their bodies pumped, sucked, reshaped, and mangled into a nigh-impossible fantasy created by men in overly-expensive ugly suits.

So, yeah, go ahead and complain about their looks. More for us.

The ones playing the “But fat is unhealthy! I’m just concerned about your HEALTH” card - just stop. You’re not fooling anyone. We all know that if a girl smoked, drank, and ate toxic chemicals for breakfast you’d still shag her without hesitation was long as she fit your idiotic criteria for HOT. You don’t care about anybody’s health, you’re just using it as an excuse to be a judgmental prick. I hope every shallow prick on this thread gains 200 lbs.

If you found out she wasn’t a natural blonde, you wouldn’t give an eff. You wouldn’t moan and groan about how she DECEIVED poor little victim you. The fatness IS the issue. And sorry, but that makes you shallow.

I imagine the reason many of these girls hide behind flattering camera angles is because they know how harshly they will be judged by superficial pricks like you who aren’t all that attractive themselves yet think they deserve a Barbie clone. If deception is wrong, shouldn’t you guys be feeling guilty about your SELF-deception?

Women are human, they have flaws, bumps and bulges. Guys who can accept that will find a woman and be happy with her. Guys who can’t accept that should stick to Real Dolls. They’re made precisely to measure and they never get cellulite. And they won’t be more of an intellectual challenge than you can handle.

VERY sexist…where are the “fat boy” pics……and a couple of those chicks AREN’T that fat….well, they’re fat, but not morbidly obese…

..

“but a façade of smoke and mirrors is no way to begin a relationship”

Neither is being a vapid prick who defines only looks and claims that it’s not shallow by the fact the chick was “totally lying” by not having a pictures of herself, on her personal website, from every angle, direction, lighting, and what the hell, even nude so that some shallow moron can make sure she’s worth his time.

” and if the lovely lady of your online dreams isn’t truthful with you about herself upfront, can you be so sure you can trust her down the road?”

And if the dipshit you talked yourself into meeting is equating putting a picture of yourself ON YOUR OWN WEBSITE from a flattering angle since lookist dicks such as himself will judge you based almost entire on that, can you trust that he won’t make the shaky logical leap that that somehow makes you a liar and therefore you are in turn an untrustworthy person?

Eugene, you are a virgin. And a misogynist. What a sad combo.

But on your part: Hooves? Larger than expected dinner bill? Such a professional writing style you have. Definitely add this one to the resume.